North
Texas Highway Receiving Extensive Reconstruction
Duininck Bros. In Charge Of
$46 Million Upgrade To U.S. Highway 75
By Mark Rea
Motorists making their way north from Dallas toward the Oklahoma
border along U.S. Highway 75 will soon enjoy a smoother ride.
Although the $46 million reconstruction of a 10-mi. stretch
of the highway in southern Grayson County between Van Alstyne
and Sherman is not scheduled to be completed until early 2005,
the Texas division of general contractor Duininck Bros. Inc.
believes the project could be finished several months early.
"This project is moving along at a very good pace,"
said Ken Santjer, project superintendent for Duininck Bros.
"I think we're going be finished by the fall of 2004."
The U.S. 75 reconstruction began on the TxDOT drawing board
as a simple refurbishing project with hot mix asphalt as the
desired pavement topping. But the roadway had been overlaid
with HMA in the late 1980s, and experienced severe rutting
problems especially in the northbound lanes.
TxDOT ordered another overlay project in 1994, but it did
not alleviate the rutting problems. When it came time to resurface
the highway again in 2002, the state highway department opted
for complete reconstruction.
"The project was originally designed to remove all of
the asphalt pavement and replace it with a newer design, perhaps
a stone matrix configuration," said TxDOT Sherman area
engineer Bobby Littlefield. "But we eventually decided
to completely rebuild that section of the highway."
The highway was initially built in the early 1960s with design
specifications of the time that included shorter access and
egress ramps for slower speed limits. "We felt the time
was right to go ahead and design for up to 70-mph speeds,
and make this highway compatible for a future six-lane facility,"
Littlefield said. "So we scrapped our overlay concept
and went with a complete reconstruction."
The new, safer design for faster speeds could help qualify
U.S. 75 for redesignation as an interstate highway in the
future.
"There is a lot more that needs to happen before that
takes place, but one of the requirements is that the controlled-access
freeway feature a 70-mph design," Littlefield added.
"This is not necessarily the first step - it's just one
step. But we felt if we were going to spend the money to rebuild
this section of the highway, why not go ahead and spend a
little bit more and bring it up to meet that design speed
criteria?"
Getting Started
Construction began on the five-phase project in April 2002
with detours being built for both northbound and southbound
traffic. "We actually widened the highway in both directions
to make room for two lanes of detoured traffic," Santjer
said.
In the second and perhaps most difficult phase, work crews
installed a new roadway course over what was the grass median
that divided the existing four-lane highway.
"Anytime you have to close lanes and reroute traffic,
it's tough," Santjer said "We had to wait for traffic-control
personnel to set everything up to be able to go to work in
the morning, then we had to quit early enough in the evening
to get everything down for the afternoon commute. It made
for some slower going in the beginning stages."
Once the middle section was completed, work on the southbound
lanes began with demolition of the existing 8-in. pavement.
The old course was removed and crushed, then recycled back
into the base course of the project.
"We cement-treated the course and the subgrade, then
overlaid that with a 1-in. hot mix layer and 13 in. of continuously
reinforced concrete pavement," Santjer said.
Crews used a variety of conventional concrete mixes, provided
by McKinney-based Lattimore Materials Co. and mixed at Duininck
Bros.' onsite portable batch plant.
Once complete, the project will contain more than 626,300
sq. ft. of concrete. In mid-July work crews totaled approximately
100 working average 6-12 schedules. Santjer estimated the
workforce and schedule will continue throughout the remainder
of the project.
Paving Particulars
In mid-July, workers were setting their sights on completing
reconstruction of the southbound lanes and getting ready to
concentrate on the northbound section.
Crews from Roanoke-based J.L. Steel LP are handling installation
of the reinforcing steel for the project, which was supplied
by the Lofland Co. of Fort Worth. Workers install No. 5 and
No. 6 rebar approximately 6 in. apart with transverse bars
placed every 24 in.
Following behind the rebar crews is the paving train led by
the concrete paver, which averages laying approximately 2,000
cu. yds. of pavement per day. A tining machine then cuts grooves
into the concrete pattern to create water displacement for
better traction on the pavement. Finally, the curing machine
sets up the concrete pavement for its finished appearance.
The concrete sets fairly quickly, but any vehicle weighing
more than 14,000 lbs. is not allowed on the pavement for at
least four days. The full curing cycle is seven days after
which the pavement can be opened to normal traffic.
Also included in the project is electrical work for roadway
lights and conduit to be located in the concrete median barrier.
That work is considered the fifth of the project's five phases
although installation of the lights will be completed in the
future. The only lights installed as part of the current project
will be operational at three bridges and the 14 on- and off-ramps
on either side of the roadway.
"The finished project will have two lanes in each direction,"
Littlefield said. "But to accommodate future use as a
six-lane facility, the entire outside shoulder is paved to
a width of 12 ft. rather than the conventional 10-ft. width.
That way, when we expand, that third lane will also be in
place. All we'll have to do is remove the concrete median
and build the 10-ft. shoulders."
Littlefield estimated that the six-lane configuration could
be installed as soon as five years after the completion of
the reconstruction project. "It could be as little as
five or as much as 10 years," he said. "Either way,
we'll be ready."
| PROJECT
TEAM |
| GENERAL
CONTRACTOR: |
Duininck Bros. Inc.,
Texas Division, Roanoke |
| LOCATION: |
Grayson County, south
of Sherman |
| OWNER:
|
Texas Department of
Transportation, Austin |
| CONCRETE
SUPPLIER: |
Lattimore Materials
Co., McKinney |
| REINFORCING
STEEL: |
The Lofland Co., Fort
Worth (supplier); J.L. Steel LP, Roanoke (installer) |
| BRIDGEWORK:
|
Concho Construction
Co. Inc., Garland |
| ELECTRICAL
INSTALLATION: |
Artex Electric Inc.,
Wylie |
|